alt.politics.republicans

On Feb 25, 8:57=A0pm, Simpson wrote:
> TheReturnoftheROMAN wrote:
> > On Feb 25, 8:49 pm, "Barbi Satin" wrote:
> >> "Simpson" wrote in message
>
> >>news:$@...
>
> >>> Despite what some would have you believe, John McCain's poll numbers s=
ank
> >>> against both Hillary and Obama after the New York Times published thei=
r
> >>> story about McCain's trading legislative favors for sex and money.
> >>> The story broke on Feb 21st at which time McCain's poll numbers looked=

> >>> like this:
> >>> John McCain ----- 48%
> >>> Barack Obama ---- 47%
> >>> John McCain ----- 50%
> >>> Hillary Clinton - 46%
> >>> The same poll taken two days after the story broke looks like this:
> >>> John McCain ----- 41%
> >>> Barack Obama ---- 51%
> >>> John McCain ----- 43%
> >>> Hillary Clinton - 48%
> >>> So all this bullshit about the NYT story actually *helping* McCain, is=

> >>> just that... so much bullshit.
> >> Even these numbers have to be bullshit. Bush is at 19%. McCain has come=
out
> >> and said he would be a Bush 3rd term. So how does Bush 3rd term come ou=
t at
> >> even 43%? =A0Are the polls just setting us up for yet another Diebold s=
tolen
> >> election. Keep your powder dry and get armed now. The solution to 1984 =
is
> >> 1776.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > ________________________________________________________________________=
___=AD__________
> > Could you re-post this in English?
>
> Would fourth grade level be okay?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

____________________________________________________________________________=
_______-
It would be an improvement!