alt.politics.republicans

In News $ @ ,, Royal Dalton at
catcher@ , typed this:

> Scruffy McScruffovitch wrote:
>> In News $ @ ,, Royal Dalton
>> at catcher@ , typed this:
>>
>>> Scruffy McScruffovitch wrote:
>>>> In News $% @ ,, Royal
>>>> Dalton at catcher@ , typed this:
>>>>
>>>>> Scruffy McScruffovitch wrote:
>>>>>> In News $ @ ,, Royal
>>>>>> Dalton at catcher@ , typed this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Scruffy McScruffovitch wrote:
>>>>>>>> In News $ @ ,, Royal
>>>>>>>> Dalton at catcher@ , typed this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Scruffy McScruffovitch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In News $% @ ,,
>>>>>>>>>> Royal Dalton at catcher@ , typed this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Scruffy McScruffovitch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In News 13c2ekjppgnesb6@ ,, Gregg Luze at
>>>>>>>>>>>> Gregg@ , typed this:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Scruffy McScruffovitch" wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news: $ @ ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In News s351c3h8rap80a3a397rt6npt07if2h5g4@ ,, Don
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Homuth at , typed this:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:43:27 -0700, "Gattman"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "SMITH29" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:nrydnfUuuqbhayHbnZ2dnUVZ_hqdnZ2d@ ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How many of you agree with this article?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eminent Domain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Last week, California officials in National City voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unanimously to use eminent domain to take over more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than 600 properties-including a nonprofit youth center
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dedicated to keeping local kids out of gangs and off
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the street. They plan to give this land to local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private developers for a group of condominiums.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taking land from private interests to give or sell to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other private interests is generally considered theft
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of property.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If just compensation is paid, it is not generally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considered Theft of anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taking something without the consent of the owner is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> theft. It doesn't make a damned bit of difference how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much money you give him. Anything less than a mutually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreed upon deal is theft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, have you filed charges against the IRS?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't pay taxes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>>>>>> Because, on paper, I own nothing, and I have zero income. They
>>>>>>>>>> can't force me to pay taxes on nothing.
>>>>>>>>> So you're a welfare bunny?
>>>>>>>> LOL! Nope. Retired at the age of 59, financially
>>>>>>>> independent. Oh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I do doubt that claim.
>>>>>> LOL! Your doubt isn't particularly relevant to the facts.
>>>>> No facts are on display yet.
>>>> Of course they are. Your inability to accept them is not my
>>>> problem. CITE!
>>>
>>
>>
>> LOL! You want me to cite my income level? Well, alrighty then.
>>
>> "I am in the top 10% of income earners in the nation."
>>
>> Scruffy McScruffovitch, 8/14/2007.
>>
>>
> OK, now p-r-o-v-e- it.

LOL! Why? Your disbelief is of no concern to me. My money spends just as
well either way.