alt.politics.republicans

Scruffy McScruffovitch wrote:
> In News $% @ ,, Royal Dalton at
> catcher@ , typed this:
>
>> Scruffy McScruffovitch wrote:
>>> In News 13c2ekjppgnesb6@ ,, Gregg Luze at
>>> Gregg@ , typed this:
>>>
>>>> "Scruffy McScruffovitch" wrote in message
>>>> news: $ @ ...
>>>>> In News s351c3h8rap80a3a397rt6npt07if2h5g4@ ,, Don Homuth at
>>>>> , typed this:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:43:27 -0700, "Gattman"
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "SMITH29" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:nrydnfUuuqbhayHbnZ2dnUVZ_hqdnZ2d@ ...
>>>>>>>> How many of you agree with this article?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Eminent Domain
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Last week, California officials in National City voted
>>>>>>>> unanimously to use eminent domain to take over more than 600
>>>>>>>> properties-including a nonprofit youth center dedicated to
>>>>>>>> keeping local kids out of gangs and off the street. They plan
>>>>>>>> to give this land to local private developers for a group of
>>>>>>>> condominiums.
>>>>>>> Taking land from private interests to give or sell to other
>>>>>>> private interests is generally considered theft of property.
>>>>>> If just compensation is paid, it is not generally considered Theft
>>>>>> of anything.
>>>>> Taking something without the consent of the owner is theft. It
>>>>> doesn't make a damned bit of difference how much money you give
>>>>> him. Anything less than a mutually agreed upon deal is theft.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> So, have you filed charges against the IRS?
>>>>
>>> I don't pay taxes.
>>>
>>>
>> Why?
>
> Because, on paper, I own nothing, and I have zero income. They can't force
> me to pay taxes on nothing.

So you're a welfare bunny?