alt.politics.republicans

Gregg Luze wrote:
> "SMITH29" wrote in message
> news:r5WdnfbkANRhYF3bnZ2dnUVZ_ryqnZ2d@ ...
>> Royal Dalton wrote:
>>> Gregg Luze wrote:
>>>> "SMITH29" wrote in message
>>>> news:OY2dnZKsFNQeE13bnZ2dnUVZ_uuqnZ2d@ ...
>>>>> Gattman wrote:
>>>>>> "SMITH29" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:nrydnfUuuqbhayHbnZ2dnUVZ_hqdnZ2d@ ...
>>>>>>> How many of you agree with this article?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eminent Domain
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Last week, California officials in National City voted unanimously to
>>>>>>> use eminent domain to take over more than 600 properties—including a
>>>>>>> nonprofit youth center dedicated to keeping local kids out of gangs
>>>>>>> and off the street. They plan to give this land to local private
>>>>>>> developers for a group of condominiums.
>>>>>> Taking land from private interests to give or sell to other private
>>>>>> interests is generally considered theft of property.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -c
>>>> It didn't happen. The whole story is supposition and is intended to get
>>>> you angry about the use of eminent domain.
>>> You mean the MISuse of ED...
>> xxxx
>> Gregg loves to talk about something that won't have any effect on him.
>> If the property he's on is bought up he simply moves his trailer to
>> another park and hooks up.
>>
>> 29
>
> All right, so what if I am not as rich as some people. You are saying that
> just because I am not rich enough to stop some hypothetical eminent domain I
> should not comment upon issues of money. I then suggest, that by your own
> logic, that you should not comment upon intelligence.
>
> G
>
xxxx
We probably should give you the merit award for come back of the week
butt since this is only Tuesday you will have to wait till Friday.

29 :-)