seattle.politics

"Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' )" wrote in
news:@:
> BOB wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >English is the first language in the United
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >States.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Says who?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >Warum nicht?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> Apparently your only tactic is to act like a
>> childish
>> >> >> ass.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > Antworten Sie la pregunta!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> thank you for proving ray's comment was correct. i
>> think
>> >> >> most
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> regulars knew it anyway.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>Let's see, the claim is that it isn't any big deal if
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>folks speak in
>> >> >> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>Tower of Babel of languages.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Who made that claim?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> So to prove my point, which is that it is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>valuable to have a common language in which to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>communicate,
>> >> >> I'm
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>replying in a mixture of languages that people might
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>choose in opposition to English.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > But that wasn't your point. You don't argue in favor
>> >> >> >> >> >> > of using
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> >> >> > common language. You argue for requiring English.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> Touche'
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> > What common language do you suggest, Esperanto? That's
>> >> >> >> >> > hopeless.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> Ray's point was that you missed your own point. You just
>> >> >> >> >> did it again with my comment.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > 1) You or Ray don't get to define what the points are.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Yes, we do. It's still a free country with free speech and
>> >> >> >> this is an open forum, in spite of you goose-stepping,
>> >> >> >> bootlicking neocon wingnut repugliKKKan lapdogs..
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > So you get to define the points and I don't get to define them?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You are certainly free to define you own points if you like but
>> >> >> we would appreciate it if you would stay on point if you can.
>> >> >> All I said was that you missed Ray's point and the point of my
>> >> >> comment, nothing more.
>> >> >>
>> >> > What was that?
>> >> >
>> >> Can't you read?
>> >>
>> > Why can't you just answer the question?
>> >
>> You had my response. That's all you get.
>>
>> >
>> >> >> > Isn't
>> >> >> > that what you are complaining about "goose-stepping,
>> >> >> > bootlicking neocon wingnut repugliKKKan lapdogs" but in your
>> >> >> > case it's "Liberal" and "Communist" lapdogging?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >I didn't "complain" about your being a oose-stepping,
>> >> >> >bootlicking neocon
>> >> >> > wingnut repugliKKKan lapdog. I just stated a fact.
>> >> >>
>> >> > Really? So you seriously think I'm part of the "KKK"?
>> >> >
>> >> I don't think I stuttered. RepugliKKKan.
>> >>
>> > What is the "KKK" supposed to mean?
>> >
>> See if you can figure it out for yourself.
>>
> 1) I can't.


the old insanity defense

--
"You tried to steal the identity of a James G. Keegan Jr. who did in
fact author a book, and you're trying to convince people that you are
the same person." -- corrupt prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey"
in an effort to cover-up his earlier lie that i was not an author

in