Group: talk.politics.misc
From: FACE
Date: Saturday, August 25, 2007 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: Why the . Ranks Low on WHO's Health-Care Study

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 08:24:33 +1000, in B J Foster
, wrote

>FACE wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 07:43:37 +1000, in B J Foster
>>, wrote
>>
>>
>>
>>>Crap
>>>
>>>
>>
>>That fairly well sums you up..........
>>
>>
>>
>1. To the challenge to propose a better measure than life expectancy:
>NO RESPONSE
>
>2. To the revelation that homicides contribute a few days to the
>YEAR difference in life expectancies:
>NO RESPONSE
>
>3. To the question about why diet and exercise are not considered
>healthcare issues:
>NO RESPONSE
>
>4. To the exposition of the repeated distortion of PJO'D (and now FACE)
>that seeks to exclude 46 million unserviced people:
>NO RESPONSE
>
>5. To rejection of the ridiculous notion that statistical averages are
>"socialisation":
>NO RESPONSE
>
>6. To the claim that the US Government has been compromised by
>commercial interests:
>NO RESPONSE
>
>7. To the epithet "crap":
>A response!
>
>ROTFL

You have refused to answer my questions but you don't like it when I don't respond
to your stupid comments. Tough on you. You get what you give, eh? Be sure to
share that with your socialist mates.

Your lot think that you can insult with impunity. You can't.