alt.politics.gw-bush

On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 19:19:19 -0400, "Joe S." wrote:

>
>"Roger" wrote in message
>news:46e47566$0$32505$4c368faf@ ...
>> [Who thinks the word choice wasn't deliberate?
>> And juvinile?]
>>
>>
>> . official calls bin Laden "virtually impotent"
>> 35 minutes ago
>>
>>
>> President George W. Bush's homeland security adviser said on Sunday al
>> Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden is "virtually impotent" and can do little
>> more than send videotaped messages.
>
>
>Well, if that's the case, and because it's Bin Laden's people attacking us
>in Iraq, how about we just come one home? After all, if he is "impotent,"
>then we don't need 168,000 troops to fight his people.
>
>Right??

Don't confuse the issue. You correctly stated that invading
Iraq would not have been part of a legitimate war on terror; stick to
that. The Iraqis are not "bin Laden's people" either, although he
would probably say that they are his brothers in Islam or some such
bull.