talk.politics.misc

Harry Hope wrote:
> From The Hill, 9/13/07:
> /2007/09/13/62-democratic-senators/
>
> 62 Democratic Senators
>
> by Brent Budowsky
>
>
> The resounding Democratic victory in the 2006 Senate campaign creates
> a historic anomaly in which the Senate Democratic Caucus could
> increase to more than 60 senators, with historic implications for
> American politics and all three branches of government.
>
> The media are simply focusing on the 22 Senate Republican seats at
> stake in 2008.
>
> But the Republican senators considering whether to retire, and the
> smart K Street money, are homed in on the 2010 elections as well,
> where another 19 Republican Senate seats are at stake.
>
> Do the math.

I personally think we're watching the end of a political party, much
like we saw the end of communism after the people of the former Soviet
Union were given free elections. They voted communists out of office
and we' re going to vote conservatives out of office.

One of the reasons the Democrats let Bush get away with his silly war is
because it's good politics. They hope to gain so many seats that they
can do whatever they want. It's smart politics, but it's lousy
government. They should be impeaching the SOB instead.

--
Pat
Impeach Bush
/

Articles of Impeachment
Center for Constitutional Rights
/april_2006/