Alohacyberian wrote:
> "dangerman" < @ > wrote in message
> news:NKidnR61-53XeJ7anZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@ ...
>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>> In article
>>> dangerman < @ > wrote:
>>>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>> Conservatives were pointing out something that was utterly
>>>>>>>> irrelevant.
>>>>>>> ...that idiots like Baldwin, Streisand, Sarandon, Robbins, Asner
>>>>>>> don't understand politics (the idiot Holman's words). If you have a
>>>>>>> problem with that take it up with the idiot Holman, he's the one who
>>>>>>> raised the issue. I merely pointed out his error.
>>>>>> Harold, you yourself said it was "modern conservatives" who raised the
>>>>>> issue.
>>>>> No, it was the idiot Holman. Reading comprehension clearly is not your
>>>>> strong point.
>>>> Harold, you said modern conservatives raised the issue. You said that.
>>> No, the idiot Holman did.
>> So modern conservatives have NOT claimed that Baldwin, Streisand,
>> Sarandon, Robbins, Asner know nothing about politics? Make up your mind,
>> Harold. Now you are admitting that conservatives don't claim what you said
>> they claimed. Which is it?
>>
> To my knowledge the above celebrities have yet to demonstrate any such
> political knowledge, civic understanding or political acumen.
But you haven't demonstrated any political knowledge, civic
understanding or political acumen, so you wouldn't ber able to identify
it. In fact, the above celebrities *have* demonstrated political
knowledge, civic understanding and political acumen. I've seen them
demonstrate these things many times. You don't see the mainstream media
Keith so you wouldn't have seen it anyway.
> If you'd like
> to post some citations to the contrary, I'd be happy to read them, though I
> doubt if I'll consider and reliable sources.
> KM
If I thought you would be happy to read them, i would post them, but
since I know you are just trying to waste my time, it would be
pointless. Deal with your demons, Keith. That will be a better use of
your time for all of us.