alt.politics.usa.republican

On 03 Sep 2007 18:04:53 GMT
Nobody wrote:

> Duncan Patton wrote:
>
> > On 02 Sep 2007 19:22:05 GMT
> > Nobody wrote:
> >
> >> Duh wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 12:21:07 GMT
> >> > Roedy Green wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In the 1950s in the USA, Canada (where I grew up) or Britain,
> >> >> nearly every family lived in a house. The father worked and
> >> >> the Mom stayed home and looked after the kids. Even the
> >> >> "poor" people lived this way. Today only the well to do can
> >> >> afford houses. Both parents work, and often one parent has
> >> >> more than one job.
> >> >>
> >> >> Due to the efforts of leaders like Reagan, Mulroney and
> >> >> Thatcher, there has been a concerted push to end this
> >> >> comfortable middle class and create a ultra rich upper class
> >> >> lording over an increasingly serf-like underclass.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > The problem is with the concept of property. Lots of people
> >> > want to imangine it is something God gave them for the sweat
> >> > off their brow.
> >> >
> >> > Material manipulation of the Universe is the reward or result
> >> > of hard work. Property is a social construct wherein people are
> >> > granted some exclusive use of their labor's rewards.
> >>
> >> So Duh. is that why you live with John?
> >>
> >
> > No. I live with my father because he is 84 and I'm a gimped
> > single father with no life.
>
> You never quit, do you?
>

Nope. Now tell your masters to go get fucked ;)

Dhu