alt.politics.republicans

On Aug 9, 5:53 am, Jeff wrote:
> MioMyo wrote:
> > To all Libs, go right ahead and do plead your best case that your imperial
> > highness is NOT playing Politics with our Soldiers Very Lives!
>
> > /0278pr/?id=0278
>
> > **********************************
> > Tonight, the House passed S. 1927, a bill approved by the Senate yesterday,
> > which is an interim response to the Administration's request for changes in
> > FISA, and which was sought to fill an intelligence gap which is asserted to
> > exist. Many provisions of this legislation are unacceptable, and, although
> > the bill has a six month sunset clause, I do not believe the American people
> > will want to wait that long before corrective action is taken.
> > **********************************
>
> > I'd laugh if it weren't for the fact that the princess's hypocrisy couldn't
> > have such serious consequences for the US Soldier!
>
> Like what? The bill has nothing to do with Iraq or intelligence
> related to Iraq.
>
> The reason why the bill was approved is because McConnell put his
> credibility on the line.
>
> The reason why Pelosi wants changes is because the same people that
> are administering the program are the same ones who will be overseeing
> it. Gee, what a bad strategy that has repeated turned out to be.
>
> The White House wanted only AG Gonzales to oversee. The bad
> compronise was to put McConnell's name on the oversite also. This
> should have some independant judiciary oversite and that was the way the
> bill was originally written.
>
> The laws regarding FISA and NSA have been modified over 50 times
> since their 70's inception and a dozen or so times since 9/11.

Well, that's shouldn't really surprise the morons in
Washingtoon.
Since they've modified the FCC laws over 1000 times since 1950.




>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -