talk.politics.misc

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:34:02 -0700, 3729 Dead
wrote:

>On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:01:57 -0400, SeanR wrote:
>
>>zzpat wrote:
>>>
>>> Since liberals were against the war from 'day one' of course we're
>>> against any Democrat who are delusional enough to say the "surge is
>>> working."
>>>
>>
>>This is a fascinating -- and very telling -- statement. I actually read
>>this after my last post where I claimed the far left will dismiss any
>>positive news on Iraq at face value. And here you prove my point with
>>commendable brevity.
>
>Given that this admin has done NOTHING but fucking lie to us every
>time they say anything with the word "Iraq" in it, why should any
>rational person believe them now?

Zepp probably considers himself a rational person... when in fact, he
doesn't even know any rational people.

>>It is completely irrational for anyone to judge reports on progress in
>>Iraq (or the lack of progress) based on their opinion of the invasion
>>before the war. One has nothing to do with other. Your marvelously
>>accurate statement shows that many on the left are simply incapable of
>>independent thought on this subject (and I would argue any subject even
>>tangentially related to GWB, for that matter). Their political
>>thought process has become nothing short of tribal -- it's "us" versus
>>"him."
>
>You ignorant clot! The war ended with the invasion. What came after
>was a slimy, third-rate occupation with the United States as slimy,
>third-rate occupiers, comic-opera Colonel Klinks with helicopters.

--
["that the district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions
arising under the Constitution] would only apply if I was taking the street
to court."
--. ..
/group/ /msg/b07914d210a0a5b5?dmode=source&hl=en