alt.politics.republicans

In article
<159f6810-cbc9-4a92-8364-273111f6e67a@>,
Christopher Helms wrote:

> On Feb 22, 10:47 am, "Tani Jantsang ©" wrote:
> > "Bill Mulcahy" wrote in message
> >
> > news:47be2994$0$6961$4c368faf@...
> >
> > >I thought he might be a breath of fresh air, but now I think he has bad
> > >breath.
> >
> > > I toyed with the idea of voting for him because I was so upset with McCain
> > > getting the republican nod instead of Mitt Romney. But listening to his
> > > stance on immigration really disgusted me. He seems to worry more about
> > > "undocumented workers" (illegal alien criminal invaders) than he does for
> > > America.
> >
> > > I don't know if I'll hold my nose and vote for McCain, but I won't vote
> > > for Obama.
> >
> > All 3 are the same on immigration.  McCain, however, is for a 100 year war.
> > He's insane.
>
>
> Apparently Ralph Nader has decided that Obama isn't quite liberal
> enough and is considering running for president again. If the election
> is close maybe he can ratfuck his own side of the aisle again and
> default John McCain into the white house. It's too bad Nader is too
> goddamned stupid to realize that he's not helping liberalism by
> keeping liberals he doesn't personally approve of out of office. Which
> is exactly what he has been trying to do with all his might by
> obsessively splitting the liberal vote since 2000. He'll probably go
> to his grave considering himself a great liberal maverick without ever
> realizing that in truth he couldn't have helped conservative,
> corporatist, pro-war Republicans more if he had sat down and tried.

Who's paying him? That's what I want to know.