alt.politics.republicans

"Thanatos" wrote in message
news:@...
> In article
> <7535d9ac-d6ef-47dd-806a-e0197dc2ef91@>,
> @ wrote:

>> Marvin Bush's security company was in charge of WTC security just
>> months before 9/11. Make of that what you will.
>
> Nothing. It's not the attack was successful because the security guards
> were napping. What the hell could any security company have done or not
> done that would have *any* effect on whether someone flew a plane into
> the side of the building?

I think that particular line of thought is part of the 'Aircraft collision
could not have caused the collapse. Rather explosives were planted in the
buildings' conspiracy theory. The building security would have had to be in
on it.

Silly I know.

The biggest argument against a government conspiracy is Iraqi WMD's. If the
US Government conspiracy couldn't manage to plant WMD's in Iraq following
the invasion to 'discover' then we are expected to believe they managed the
much more massive Sep 11 conspiracy?