Group: seattle.politics
From: never@million
Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: NAAFA confirms 90% to 95% of people don't want a fat partner...

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:41:58 -0700, Rudy Canoza
wrote:

>Guv Bob wrote:
>> Rudy, I have heard some assinine comments in my life -- for example, those by Renee & Evelyn. But until now, when I read your comments, I had no idea anyone could be as STUPID as YOU are!!
>>
>> You really need to talk a walk down to the lake and jump in.
>
>My analysis of obesity is correct, you stupid
>top-posting zero-contributing pubic hair.

Less than required intake of food (caloric) = loss of weight;
Required intake of food (caloric) = maintenance of weight;
More than required intake of food (caloric) = gaining of weight.

There are a few situations that are medically based where people
do gain weight. There are medicines that can cause weight gain.
However, the numbers don't match up with the rising tide of
morbidly obese people. Excuses for obesity are many and varied.
However, that does not solve the numerous problems that result
from an increasing fat population.

Weight reducing has resulted in a cottage industry of clinics,
gyms, spas, diet programs, all and more, costing millions of
dollars a year.

What happened to the words "No more" or "No thank you, I have
had enough"?

The answer for national obesity seems headed toward creation of
yet another bureaucracy that employees more sedentary obese folks
that operate with secretarial mentality poking keys on a computer.

DCI