alt.politics.republicans

TheReturnoftheROMAN wrote:
> On Feb 25, 8:57 pm, Simpson wrote:
>> TheReturnoftheROMAN wrote:
>>> On Feb 25, 8:49 pm, "Barbi Satin" wrote:
>>>> "Simpson" wrote in message
>>>> news:$@...
>>>>> Despite what some would have you believe, John McCain's poll numbers sank
>>>>> against both Hillary and Obama after the New York Times published their
>>>>> story about McCain's trading legislative favors for sex and money.
>>>>> The story broke on Feb 21st at which time McCain's poll numbers looked
>>>>> like this:
>>>>> John McCain ----- 48%
>>>>> Barack Obama ---- 47%
>>>>> John McCain ----- 50%
>>>>> Hillary Clinton - 46%
>>>>> The same poll taken two days after the story broke looks like this:
>>>>> John McCain ----- 41%
>>>>> Barack Obama ---- 51%
>>>>> John McCain ----- 43%
>>>>> Hillary Clinton - 48%
>>>>> So all this bullshit about the NYT story actually *helping* McCain, is
>>>>> just that... so much bullshit.
>>>> Even these numbers have to be bullshit. Bush is at 19%. McCain has come out
>>>> and said he would be a Bush 3rd term. So how does Bush 3rd term come out at
>>>> even 43%? Are the polls just setting us up for yet another Diebold stolen
>>>> election. Keep your powder dry and get armed now. The solution to 1984 is
>>>> 1776.- Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>> ___________________________________________________________________________­__________
>>> Could you re-post this in English?
>> Would fourth grade level be okay?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________-
> It would be an improvement!


You must be very bright.

Take this test and report back. It only takes 13 minutes:

/