alt.politics.gw-bush

Black Elk wrote:
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> Black Elk wrote:
>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> Black Elk wrote:
>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> Black Elk wrote:
>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>> Black Elk wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Black Elk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Gandalf Grey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rudy Canoza" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:13rs06kotgvt451@...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dannie keeps insisting that Bush Derangement Syndrome
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refers to Bush partisans, when the term clearly was coined
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to describe Bush haters
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And coined by blindly loyal Bush asskissers
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, little crazed BDS-crippled leftist fucktard.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Krauthammer's term is fully applicable to self-blinded
>>>>>>>>>>>> fucktards like you whose hatred for a person causes them to
>>>>>>>>>>>> come unhinged and lose all touch with reality.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you tell us how much Bush's war in Iraq has cost in lives
>>>>>>>>>>> and taxpayer dollars?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Whose lives? About $500 billion, so far.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can start with Americans and then Iraqis. Then tell us the
>>>>>>>>> wounded for each.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Coming up on 4,000 Americans; quite a few tens of thousands of
>>>>>>>> Iraqis, although most of them have been killed by fellow Iraqis.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is the projected cost for the war including future
>>>>>>>>> occupation and future care of the wounded and replacement of
>>>>>>>>> military hardware?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Look it up yourself, shitbag. I'm not your gofer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see you're a time-wasting little shitstain.
>>>>>
>>>>> If that were the case
>>>>
>>>> It is. Nice use of the subjunctive case, though.
>>>
>>> Your shell game shows you can't debate honestly.
>>
>> No shell game. But your attempt at timewasting by asking a load of
>> insincere questions shows that *you* never had any intention of
>> debating honestly. You're a deeply partisan shitbag, only trying to
>> play a game you're too stupid to play.
>
> Insincere questions? What is sincere question to you?

Your bullshit set-up questions, shitbag. *All* of them.


>>>>>>>>>>> Can you tell us where Iraq's WMD is hidden?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There weren't any.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why did we go to war then?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you tell us about Iraq's ties to international terrorism?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Prior to the war, there weren't any ties.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're saying the war created ties to international terrorism?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What do you think I'm saying, shitstain?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Take your time, we'll be waiting.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No need, I have the answers ready to hand.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you think that there is a good reason to dislike Bush?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Plenty.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would say your support of BDS being generated by dislike of
>>>>>>> Bush just because he is who he is is fallacious.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're losing this thread.
>>>>
>>>> No, I've taken it hands down.
>>>
>>> If cutting your opponents posts is winning,
>>
>> That's not what has produced the victory.
>
> Oh, what has produced the victory?

Knowledge, compelling logic, insight - you know, that
kind of thing.

Well, I guess *you* wouldn't know about that, would you?


> Bush is one of the worst presidents the . has had to endure

Yes, I agree.



> yet you spend your time telling us we are the ones with BDS.

And you are! All of the jackholes, you included, that
I've been beating up on today very clearly suffer from
it. You're all, the whole lot of you, a bunch of
impotent blowhards who *reflexively* hate Bush. Your
hatred is hardly based at all on any of the bad things
he's done.