Group: seattle.politics
From: Lobby Dosser
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2008 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: Judge again rules druggists can deny morning-after pill

"Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' )" wrote:

>
>
> Lobby Dosser wrote:
>>
>> "Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' )" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Chom Noamsky wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' )" wrote in
>> >> message news:@...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Chom Noamsky wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' )" wrote
>> >> >> in message news:@...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Chom Noamsky wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> "Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' )"
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > So [you] would argue against the right of society to have
>> >> >> >> > public policy?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The public health issues surrounding Plan B have already
>> >> >> >> been explored and
>> >> >> >> dealt with in depth. That's why it's now a legal,
>> >> >> >> over-the-counter product.
>> >> >> >> The debate didn't just start yesterday, its current status
>> >> >> >> is the culmination of years of research and debate. It's a
>> >> >> >> done deal and now the
>> >> >> >> religious fascists are having tantrums becasue they didn't
>> >> >> >> get their way.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > Answer the question: So [you] would argue against the right
>> >> >> > of society to have public policy?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I just stated that due diligence with the public interest has
>> >> >> already taken
>> >> >> place, and rightfully so. Do you want me to say it in crayon?
>> >> >>
>> >> > I'm pretty sure that the feud is still going on. Didn't the
>> >> > courts side with the pharmacists?
>> >>
>> >> The only fueding going on is by the fundies who didn't get their
>> >> way.
>> >>
>> > I haven't been following the court case(s) very closely, but didn't
>> > the pharmacists win, at least so far?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Yes.
>>
> So why is Numb Chumpsky telling us otherwise?
>
>
>

he's a Chump and can't comprehend the subject line

Here is the original link:

/local/?source=mypi