seattle.politics

On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:09:24 -0700, "Gatt"
wrote:

>
>"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>news:Xns99C3AFC107829ta2eene2@ ...
>>
>>> Taking aim at politicians' daughters is a cheap shot requiring a cheap
>>> camera and virtually no honesty or intellectual merit.
>>
>> If, however, said daughters make themselves a target.....
>
>"Target"?
>
>The difference with the Playboy shoot is that she chose to be photographed
>and negotiated her fee. The paparazzi and political hacks following
>around the daughters of politicians in order to do political damage or to
>sell tabloid photos don't negotiate with the victim.
>
>Some of these paparazzi types need to disappear; ideally in a bloody mist in
>the middle of a public street. Wouldn't bother me in the least if a
>President protects his daughters by shutting down websites that invade her
>privacy, or if a few of paparazzi types suddenly disappeared. Maybe they
>could do some photo shoots at Gitmo.
>
>-c

You advocate violence, lack of a free press, restricting the free flow
of information, protecting the privileged among us, and concentration
camps to feed the egos of American Fascist Presidents. As long as you
are the dictator...


O'ROURKE: I mean, this is lots of fun attacking George Bush, who is an
idiot and obviously screwed up on this completely
BEHAR: Thank you!
MAHER: Oh, thank you!

PJ O'Rourke on Bill Maher show 9/16/2005