alt.politics.republicans

On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:18:52 -0700, Spread Eagle®
wrote:

>On Aug 23, 5:12 pm, "Gattman" wrote:
>
>> >>> >>If there was ANY economic upside in having it unrestricted it would
>> >>> >>be bigtime. The fact of the matter is that the only people who
>> >>> >>argue for it are the people who wanna get loaded.
>>
>> >>> You can't get loaded on hemp.
>>
>> >> No, but potheads are clearly operating under the premise that if they
>> >> can just somehow winnow a legalization of plants of the genus Cannabis
>> >> for one purpose that it'll be one step closer to overall
>> >> legalization.
>>
>> Are you calling all those farmers potheads?
>
>Not at all. But I would be calling them dope growers, inasmuch as the
>growing of any plants of the genus Cannabis in the US is ILLEGAL, and
>the only people who do are in fact dope growers.

Really? So that little plot down at Ole Miss that grows pot for the
government is illegal?
/about/organization/nacda/
Goddamned hippy college kids. :-)





>
>
>> Do you have a legitimate source
>> for your nonsense or are you just shooting from the hip here?
>
>
>Life. As in what has already been stated, the pertinent parts I've
>handily preserved for you hereinabove. Whatever purpose for which it
>is that you or anybody else wants to legalize hemp can be done with
>something else, better, cheaper, and faster.
>
>
>> >> So it's no coincidence that those who advocate for legalized hemp look
>> >> and act just like the audience members of a Cheech
>> >> and Chong movie.
>>
>> I take it you've either been in the audience of a Cheech and Chong movie and
>> thus they look and act just like you, or you're talking out of your ass.
>
>Life experience together with the powers of observation. Come down
>off your high and try it. While I'm thinking about it, do they drug
>test people who pilot aircraft?
>
>
>> I advocate legalization of growing hemp.
>
>Why? And a corollary, why would you want to join that freakshow?

You mean this freakshow?
/articles/
Too bad there aren't many "freaks" on the page eh?
>
>
>
>> Learn something today: /wiki/Hemp
>
>Do you have any understanding about how the entires into wikipedia
>come to be? Now picture in your mind's eye the sorts of person(s) who
>sit around editing the subject hemp on wikipedia. Enough said.

So juist what does a pot smoker look like? You seem to be some kind
of expert so please tell us the physical charecteristics that seperate
pot smokers from everyone else. I really wnat to know how you can
tell with a look if someone is a stoner or not?
You do realize that this isn't the 70s anymore and that pot smokers
don't necessarily have to be Tommy Chong clones? In fact the people
that I know that do resemble Tommy in appearance are all drug free.
The people I know that smoke weed all look like accountants or
executives.



Regards


Starkiller©


"Eta Kooram Nah Smech!"