seattle.politics

Rudy Canoza wrote:

> angry uncivil paulie mitchum again proved Mr.
> Anderson's point:
[..]
> >>> Regarding your charge of hypocrisy, see the goddamn subject line.
> >>
> >> Contemporary liberalism *IS* illiberal, little paulie. It has nothing
> >> whatever to do with classical liberalism.
> >
> > Christ on a stick. You've spent a whole day arguing that liberals are
> > hypocritical
>
> No.

That's what you say here, and then we read further:

> > for not being nice to people they abhor,
>
> That's an astonishing admission, little paulie: "People they abhor".
> That's the problem in a nutshell, little paulie.

So then, according to you, THE PROBLEM IN A NUTSHELL IS LIBERAL
HYPOCRISY. What's so fucking hard about this that you can't even
understand your own point?

> I genuinely don't believe that most mainstream conservatives "abhor"
> liberals, [..]

Because you're not at all self-aware. You abhor liberals, or you
wouldn't be calling them stupid hypocrites.

--
/cartoons/2007/