seattle.politics

angry uncivil paulie mitchum again proved Mr.
Anderson's point:
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>
>> angry uncivil paulie mitchum again proved Mr.
>> Anderson's point:
>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Some bigots *really are* bigots,
>>>> Little paulie: that's an empty tautology, and not what you said
>>>> earlier anyway.
>>> What I said earlier was this:
>> What you said, little paulie, was your agreement with the typical leftist
>> view that *all* conservatives are bigots.
>
> I never said that, and Curt never said it, and you're lying about it.

I'm not lying, and you *DID* say it, little paulie.
YOU are lying.

Anderson:
It has become a habit of left-liberal political
argument to use such invective to dismiss conservative
beliefs as if they don't deserve an argument and to
redefine mainstream conservative arguments as extremism
and bigotry [and conservatives as extremists and bigots].

little paulie:
...and rightfully so.

You *said* it, little paulie. Anderson said that the
left call conservatives, *generally*, extremists and
bigots...and you said "...and rightfully so.".

You *said* it, little paulie, and it's cleary what you
think anyway: "people [that liberals] abhor." Why do
liberals abhor conservatives, little paulie? Answer:
because they think they're *all* extremists and bigots.

You shot yourself in the ass, little paulie.


>> Stop lying, little paulie.
>
> Never started.

Yes, you did: "...and rightfully so."


>>> If you're interested in understanding my point, you could simply ask.
>>> That's what adults do when they're engaged in civil behavior.
>
> Not going to take me up on it?

I have already understood your point full well, little
paulie: you think conservatives - all of them - are
bigots and extremists, and so they're eeeeeeeeevil, and
therefore you abhor them.

Got it.