seattle.politics

angry uncivil paulie mitchum again proved Mr.
Anderson's point:
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>
>> angry uncivil paulie mitchum again proved Mr. Anderson's point:
>>> Curt wrote:
>>>> "Paul Mitchum" wrote in message
>>>> news: %usenet@ ...
>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [..]
>>>>>> I use a lot of foul language at times, but I apply it to rightwing
>>>>>> extremists just as much as I do to leftwing extremists.
>>>>> No, actually, you don't. You presented bigotry against liberals as if
>>>>> it were reasoned and rational. I responded in kind.
>>>> No you didn't.
>>> Yeah, you're right.
>> Yes, but not for the reason you think, little paulie. You didn't respond
>> in kind - you responded uncivilly and foully and intemperately, just as
>> Mr. Anderson said you would.
>
> But not for the reason Mr. Anderson (or you) seem to think,

For *exactly* that reason, little paulie. It's because
it's the natural and reflexive mode of expression when
"liberals" like you - who aren't really liberal,
because contemporary liberalism is illiberal - try to
respond to people you think are conservatives.


> motherfucker.

Nice touch, little paulie.