seattle.politics

On Sep 8, 10:21 pm, Bjorn wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 21:17:26 -0700, Tim Crowley
>
>
>
> wrote:
> >On Sep 8, 8:53 pm, Bjorn wrote:
> >> On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 19:57:27 -0700, "f. barnes"
>
> >> wrote:
> >> >On Sep 8, 9:07 pm, Tim Crowley wrote:
> >> >> On Sep 8, 5:54 pm, "Doug" wrote:
>
> >> >> > Your a racist.
>
> >> >> Please learn English. Damn, why are all you kkkooks so stupid? Would
> >> >> someone please buy this moron a dictionary.
>
> >> >I've noticed how on the internet many, many, people use "your" for
> >> >"you're". I think that in a few years it will become acceptable
> >> >usage. You will find it used that way all over the internet now. I've
> >> >received e-mails from reputable businesses in which "your" was used as
> >> >a contraction for "you are". Spell checkers don't catch it.
>
> >> >Similarly "their" and "they're" are becoming synonyms on the internet.
>
> >> Me thinks that's a bit subtle a topic for someone of timmy's
> >> cognition.
>
> >Words have meanings, retard. their and they're can never ever be
> >synonyms. Nor can you're and your. They are different words. How can
> >you be so dumb and live? Who feeds you?
>
> What, you want to pretend you're intelligent now? Okie doke,
> timmyturmoil.
>
> How do you imagine language evolves, professor? Why do you think (as
> if you did think) English is spoken and written as it is in 2007, and
> not as it was in New York in 1760, or in England in 1430? That latter
> date, you would be able to read or understand very little of "English"
> timmy. If I went back to England in the year 990, you would not be
> able to read or understand spoken English at all.
>
> It did not change because a college professor or that kind of person
> said it should. I changed because ordinary people added and changed
> words and grammar to their own dialects. In much the way Mr Barnes
> points out.
>
> Those people were, like, really dumb, right timmyturmoil? They weren't
> using the language the right way and they were changing words and the
> people who knew how to write changed the way they wrote words, and
> they did all those things on their own. Boy were they stoopid, didn't
> they now how to ryte English qoreklye?
>
> timmy, judging from your posts ad nauseam, nearly anything involving
> the subtlety of authentic knowledge is beyond you. So much so that you
> don't, apparently, understand that is beyond you.

You can type all day long, troll. You're will still be a different
word than Your. Good luck in your future endeavors, you fucking suck
at this.