talk.politics.misc

Scout wrote:
> "Bama Brian" wrote in message
> news:13g7cqapipd7sa6@ ...
>> Scout wrote:
>>> <* US *> wrote in message
>>> news:k9h4g3dose5vcnv3l5ed0o45vt0s79ga62@ ...
>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:55:46 GMT, "Morton Davis"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 1: How do you get access.
>>>> Many of the systems are connected to phone lines
>>>> and many of the systems have wireless connectivity.
>>> Doesn't do you any good if the system rejects inbound data.
>>>
>>>>> 2: How do you adjust for local issues on the ballot?
>>>> Why bother with those?
>> If the system is connected to the internet, how would you know it rejected
>> all incoming data?
>
> More excuses.

Scout, I've done a point-by-point rebuttal of what you've said. I've
even shown you how such subversion could be done at the microprocessor
level - and neither you, nor anyone else, could detect it without
destroying the machines.

Yet you say it's excuses.

Don't be surprised when you get more of the same old march to tyranny
from the politicians who get _elected_by_machines_ .

There _is_ such a thing as an appropriate technology. We here in this
NG discuss one such each and every day.

--
Cheers,
Bama Brian
Libertarian