alt.politics.republicans

On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:41:09 -0500, kT wrote:

>Starkiller© wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:17:55 -0400, "Wayne H. Wilhelm"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "the_blogologist" wrote in message
>>> news: %nobody@ ...
>>>> kT wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> the_blogologist wrote:
>>>>>> kT wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the_blogologist wrote:
>>>>>>>> kT wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the_blogologist wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> GoMavs wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you truly believe that Global Warming is perfectly fine because
>>>>>>>>> warming >> and cooling are natural acts then you are an idiot. > All
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> CO2 we're putting into the atmosphere, used to be in the >
>>>>>>>>> atmosphere.
>>>>>>>>> Now whose an idiot? Cuz you said so, cuz you heard it from somebody
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> heard it from Rush.
>>>>>>>> I don't listen to Rush, but i can read:
>>>>>>> And you can cut and paste too. You are overqualified for usenet
>>>>>>> science.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > /wiki/Coal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > /wiki/Petroleum
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you think it's perfectly ok to put much of the carbon dioxide
>>>>>>> sequestered into the ground over billions of years, right back into
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> atmosphere, in something like a couple of hundred years.
>>>>>> It doesn't hurt a thing. More CO2 makes plants grow faster and will
>>>>>> make
>>>>>> the planet greener.
>>>>> And ultimately, the planet will be 10 degrees hotter
>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>> and sea level will
>>>>> be 70 meters higher.
>>>> BIg bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>> Not a problem, according to you. Already Alabama,
>>>>> Georgia and Tennessee are in *EXTREME* drought conditions, while right
>>>>> across the Ohio,
>>>> A warmer planet causes more rainfall, not less.
>>>>
>>>> A warmer planet causes more snowfall at the poles as well.
>>> And more snowfall means more heat from the Sun gets reflected back into
>>> space generating Global Cooling.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> they are flooded. Nothing extraordinary there. No
>>>>> matter that in these places their usually bountiful agricultural
>>>>> production is nearly decimated. Who needs food anyways.
>>>> More CO2 in the atmosphere means foods grow faster and bigger.
>>> Optimal CO2 concentration in the atmosphere for plant growth is 600ppm or
>>> higher. With current ppm levels near 360, there isn't enough CO2 for plants
>>> being grown in green houses. Green houses are forced to artificially
>>> generate higher CO2 levels in order for the plants to grow.
>>
>> So greenhouse owners are pumping GREENHOUSE GAS into the environment
>> for the sake of profit. OH THE HORROR. We must have legislation
>> demanding that greenhouses cease their use of CO2 or we're all gonna
>> die!!
>> The sky is falling the sky is falling.
>>
>> And let's not forget how Norways Moose population is causing Global
>> Warming. Kill ALL MOOSES NOW IF YOU WANT TO LIVE!
>> /international/zeitgeist/0,1518,501145,
>>
>> God the shit just keeps getting sillier and sillier don't it?
>
>In other words, like all the other deniers, you've got nothing.

Where is my "denial" smartass?
So you're saying that people releasing tons of CO2 in order to bolster
their greenhouses is irrelevant? Or the fact that an adult moose
produces the equivalant CO2 emissions of a 13,000 kilometer road trip
in a car is no big deal? You people are always touting how many
different ways CO2 is released so why aren't ya'll all pissed off at
commercial greenhouses or large grazing critters?
Funny how the alarmists are so very selective as far as which CO2
should be considered bad.

BTW my crew blew around 220 pounds of the stuff just today blowing jet
lines through conduit. There were probably several thousand wireman
across the country doing the exact same thing as well.
Damned Union electricians eh? ROFL











Regards


Starkiller©


"Eta Kooram Nah Smech!"