alt.politics.gw-bush

On Feb 18, 5:11 pm, "Smirnoff" wrote:
> Geo wrote:
> > On Feb 16, 1:54 pm, stuff_st...@ wrote:
> >> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:10:22 GMT, Richard Eich
>
> >> <...@> wrote:
> >>> You attribute it to there not enough guns being carried around.
>
> >> And yet so many gun crimes result from some hot head feeling dissed
> >> and having a gun on hand.
>
> >> Throw in alcohol and drugs for lowered inhibitions and less thought
> >> and more guns is a recipe for disaster. But reality never bothers the
> >> nutters.
>
> > And while criminals continue to use their guns you would have law
> > abiding citizens remain unprotected. If you're too weak to protect
> > yourself. Just don't push your stupidity on me. I need my gun to
> > protect myself from morons like you.
>
> Wahahaha..........What are you gonna do, shoot someone that disagrees with
> you? Man you gun loons sure are a retarded lot. You think you need to use a
> gun on someone that has not even posed any threat? You are to fucking stupid
> to own a gun.

I'll shoot someone who disagrees with my ability to protect myself and/
or my family when they appear ready to use force against me and/or my
family. People like you (morons) would sit back and let criminals
have every advantage. I already own a gun and know how to use it.
You, you're too cowardly and too weak to own one. You seem to think
the govt will do just fine protecting you. Ask the families of the
NIU victims how well your little theory worked out for them.