alt.politics.republicans

judywoodisanidiot@ wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:53:17 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
> wrote:
>
>>Al Dykes wrote:
>>
>>> In article ,
>>> Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
>>>>Al Dykes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nobody with a clue about physics seems to have a problem with the way
>>>>> that the towers collapsed.
>>>>
>>>>You cannot reproduce the observed brightly glowing molten metal seen
>>>>flowing from WTC 2 using only materials which would have legitimately
>>>>been present
>>>>in the WTC or on board the planes. Prove me wrong, or concede that
>>>>further investigation is needed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Aluminum, tons of it, delivered by airplane.
>>
>>> See fig 9A, for the textbook aliminum temp/color scale, here:
>>
>>Do the math from first principles. It wasn't molten aluminum.
>
> You have no evidence that it was anything else.

Other than the facts that it could not have been molten aluminum, at or near
melting point, and there is substantial and growing evidence leading to the
conclusion that it was molten iron produced by thermate.

/watch?v=Bsp3DPTmiN0

>>Meet Jane Doe AKA Judy Wood:
>
> Who thinks that a directed energy weapon was used on the WTC. You
> really like to quote the kooks, don't you?

Did I quote Judy Wood? I left Judy Wood to speak for herself:

/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017
--
/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated


Virtus Tutissima Cassis