alt.politics.republicans

"Gunny Freedom" wrote in message
news: @ ...
> Watched the Republican Debate last night on Fox, when the viewer poll
> came in with Ron Paul on top (as expected - Paul has 10x the support in
> real life as the media would seem to have us believe) Hannity expressed
> disgust: "Oh no, here we go again!" later claiming that "Paulites" were
> re-dialing the poll over and over.
>
> Through a mistake of my own, I happen to know that is a lie.
>
> I dialed the poll with my cellphone, voting for Paul, and received a
> message saying that the message failed to send. Not to be dissuaded, I
> sent it again, but little did I know my original message was queued to
> send later. Long story short, BOTH wound up being sent.
>
> One was rejected, with a message saying "Sorry, you have already voted."
>
> The last debate poll was online, and they accused "Paulites" of voting
> dozens of times to skew the results. This is apparently why they went
> to a cell phone based vote, in order to prevent people from clearing
> their cookies and cashes, or renewing DHCP or whathaveyou, and voting
> multiple times. Whether Paul supporters did or did not vote multiple
> times in the last poll I do not know, but this time they COULD NOT have,
> and the results were the same: Paul with 33% of the poll.
>
> Nevertheless, even though Fox made multiple voting simply impossible
> (barring someone having a dozen cellphones), Sean Hannity had to express
> his disgust that "Paulites" would dishonestly skew the results.
>
> When is Fox going to admit that Ron Paul has a far far greater base of
> support than they want to believe?
> --
> Gunny Freedom's Blog: /
> Gunny's Hangout: /yabbse/ "Liberty's Price"
> Become a Rifleman: /

Who the hell is this Ron Paul dude?
Reminds me of some cross dressing Hollywierd type


Jim E