talk.politics.misc

"Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' )" wrote in
news:@:

> Andre Lieven wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2:10 pm, "Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' )" shat:
>> > Ferrous Patella wrote:
>> >
>> > > "Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' )" wrote in
>> > >news:@:
[...]
>> > > >> > I knew that SETI was privately funded
>> > > >> > today and had had public funding in the past. I didn't know
>> > > >> > exactly when the change occurred. Do I have to search out
>> > > >> > some post where I talked about SETI in the past to try to
>> > > >> > find me saying that it wasn't publicly funded anymore?
>> >
>> > > >> That would help. But am I glad you now realize you are talking
>> > > >> about an issue that has been dead for over a decade.
>> >
>> > > > Public funding of SETI doesn't currently exist but discussing
>> > > > whether or not to have it is an argument that we can still
>> > > > have.
>> >
>> > > So...no cite of where you "talked about SETI in the past to try
>> > > to find me saying that it wasn't publicly funded anymore"? Just
>> > > quoting once again where you talk about the argument in the
>> > > present tense, when the argument was done over a decade before.
>> >
>> > There's still the same argument for public funding today as when it
>> > was being debated, and there was public funding.
>>
>> No proof ever offered ? Clueless IDiot fact free lunacy fails.
>>
> Proof of what?
[...]
Are you really so dense that you:

1. Already forgot what we discussing and
2. Could not figure it out by looking up few paragraphs?