alt.politics.republicans

Dan Kimmel wrote:
> "kT" wrote in message
> news: $ @ ...
>> Dan Kimmel wrote:
>
>>>>>> So go ahead, make my day. I may decide to quit doing science
>>> altogether.
>>>>>> In that case, you be fucked. It's not going to affect me in the
> least.
>>>>> Now you're the savior of mankind? Talk about extremist delusions.
>>> Maybe
>>>>> Pat Robertson isn't quite the right analogy. You sound more like L.
> Ron
>>>>> Hubbard or Sun Myung Moon.
>>>> Nope, just another condensed matter physicist, that's all.
>>> Sure you are. And tomorrow you'll tell your doctors you're Napoleon.
>> Whatever you say, boss.
>>
>>> Just don't tell them about the aliens. They're liable to put you in
>>> restraints.
>> You mean the aliens you claim don't exist?
>>
>> Sure, Uh huh. Can you even see the stars where you live?
>>
>> Do you ever even bother to look up into the night sky at all anymore?
>
> Sure, and I don't confuse my science fiction with science fact.

There you go again ... 'science fact'. That's just hilarious.

> Your *faith* in "space aliens" is quite touching, but there is -- as yet --
> no evidence that any such exist.

Only a kook says there is 'no' evidence for anything, considering the
entire universe is available for your almost immediate inspection.

Only a deeply disturbed scientist without any spiritual awareness at all
would consider a rational debating partner a 'punching bag'. Do your
coach all your euphemisms in terms of violence? That's so religious.

> Feel free to present any concrete and
> incontrovertible evidence showing otherwise.

Well, for starters :

/wiki/Universality_%28dynamical_systems%29

In particular, we have a large body of spectroscopic data from distant
stars and galaxies, all indicating the universality of physical laws.

Nowadays the existence of intelligent aliens is a given.

Whole paradigms have passed you by, it seems.