alt.politics.usa.republican

"chasseur" wrote in message
news:13du5bjo8t3k023@ ...
>
> "Stuart Grey" < @ > a écrit dans le message de
> news:FeadnRW3LvXjYEPbnZ2dnUVZ_vzinZ2d@ ...
>> On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:52:22 -0400, chasseur wrote:
>>
>> > "Stuart Grey" < @ > a écrit dans le message de
>> > news:_-ydnZ-qDKWS10HbnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@ ...
>> >> On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 12:07:49 -0400, chasseur wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > "Stuart Grey" < @ > a écrit dans le message de
>> >> > news:HtCdnYBOPbeLukHbnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@ ...
>> >> >> On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 06:28:01 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
>> >> >>
>
>
>> So, you can't address any of my claims, huh? Like how Canada's not
>> dependent upon the US for it's national defense, (The very fact Canada is
>> pulling out of Afghanistan PROVES that Canada can't or won't hold up it's
>> end of the NATO bargain.)
>
Odd ! a load of Canuc troops from Princess somebody or others light infantry
has just arrived out their to work with our British troops, and from
experience the Canuc troops are easily as good as the Brits, and much safer
to have around when compared to the yanks.