seattle.politics

Al wrote:
> In article <45KdndxSvsd7xXfbnZ2dnUVZ8vmdnZ2d@ >,
> dangerman wrote:
>
>> Al wrote:
>>> As a backdrop to the investigation being conducted by the joint
>>> committee there is being waged a strange war, an undeclared and
>>> unacknowledged war; a war such as never before has been seen on sea or
>>> land. It is a war into which we were launched on the impulse of a
>>> President in the name of the United Nations, which has been striving
>>> ever since to disavow its paternity...
>>>
>>> I /article/62576
>> But there's this glaring problem: The GAO report and the General's
>> report conflict with each other. they can't both be right. The GAO
>> report was produced by an office set up to have no conflict's of
>> interest. The General has an obvious conflict of interest. Why do you
>> let that conflict of interest slide? Why do you trust the General, who
>> has a conflict of interest, more than the GAO, which doesn't have one?
>
> As for me, I listen to the people I know I can trust to tell the truth,
> and the only ones whith the wherewithall to get the information.
>
> That would be Harry Ried, and Achmed, the clerk down at the 7-11.


And the GAO, which was established to do this kind of work, and to do it
with no conflict of interest.