Group: alt.politics.gw-bush
From: "Clave"
Date: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: BONDE CLAIMS CLINTON WAS NEVER GUILTY-------

"George Grapman" wrote in message
news:$@...
> Clave wrote:
>> "Bill Bonde ( 'the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack' )"
>> wrote in message
>> news:@...
>>>
>>> George Grapman wrote:
>>>> Bill Bonde ( 'the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack' )
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Nicklas@ wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:54:43 +0000, "Bill Bonde ( 'the
>>>>>> oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack' )"
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAA
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He plead guilty, he wasn't convicted in a trial.
>>>>>> So then Clinton---by your reasoning--wasn't guilty for
>>>>>> his "fib"?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Craig plead guilty which means that unless that's undone, he's
>>>>> "guilty".
>>>>> That doesn't mean he's a "criminal". And there's no evidence that he
>>>>> has
>>>>> "sex offender status", which is something someone else was claiming.
>>>> And Clinton not only was never guilty he was never even charged
>>>> with
>>>> a criminal offense.
>>>>
>>> As I've pointed out, there were various Sopranos who'd never been
>>> charged much less convicted of any criminal offence, yet they were
>>> clearly criminals.
>>
>> They were also *FICTIONAL*, you dope.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
> Reminds me of the time Limbaugh noted that Jack Bauer never waits for a
> warrant.

The people who suck for that argument are the same people who want to
reanimate Reagan's corpse because they have no daddy figure.

Jim