seattle.politics

In article ,
"Clave" wrote:

> "Al" < @ > wrote in message
> news: -670175.18492123092007@ ...
> > In article ,
> > "Clave" wrote:
> >
> >> "Al" < @ > wrote in message
> >> news: -488EE0.17394123092007@ ...
> >> > In article ,
> >> > "Clave" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Al" < @ > wrote in message
> >> >> news: -3B4C6B.17281323092007@ ...
> >> >> > In article < @ >,
> >> >> > Tim Crowley wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> President Bush gave Al-queda a pass- they are as strong as
> >> >> >> ever.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Not in Iraq anymore.
> >> >>
> >> >> They never were.
> >> >
> >> > That's not what the Iraqis in Anbar say. They're pretty clear about who
> >> > they had to fight to pacify that area.
> >>
> >> "Al-Qaeda in Iraq" is not al Qaeda and never was.
> >
> > AQ is not a membership organization, it is used to identify those who
> > adhere to al-qaiadaism.
>
> AQI is not al Qaeda, period. Your allusion that they're the same is just
> wrong.


You should direct your complaint to those who label them as such. That
would be the Iraqis themselves, the US military, every major media
outlet, and, get ready for this: Osama and al-Qaida in Iraq!

But, then again, if you insist they are not really AQ, it would be
foolish to not accept the truth!